Amanda's first time bloging
Friday, April 19, 2013
Blog Phase 7
The three sources I will include into my FAR is, "It's our way or the highway, The Great Green Grid, and Smart grid". I chose these sources because they are similar to my first source that started with the blog phase one and have more detail about the energy grid. My knowledge of the topic changed since February is by understanding the meaning and facts about the energy and how the smart grid will make and replace the old grid into a better and more improved grid. The analytical question that will guide me as I write my FAR is," what and how will the smart grid be the best option for a up-to-date grid?" This approach has worked well for me because i was able to gather a lot of information about grids that will help me to figure out what I am doing with my FAR project and has also taught me how to do technical writing with blogging. If I could change anything about how I approached this blog project, it would be looking more into about blackouts instead of just the grid system because I would know more about how the grid runs to power back ups again after a blackout which would help me find better,more detailed, sources about the grid.
Friday, April 12, 2013
Phase six
‘Smart grid’ gets big
stimulus from US recovery plan.
This article talks about the money it is going to
take to build the new grid which will be a expansion of wind, solar, and
geothermal energy to make it a “smart” grid. It will help consumers to lower their
bills instead of plants and transmission lines making the cost high and
stressing out the consumers. It will respond and detect problems that occur and
is more secure and capable of withstanding cyber attacks and physical attacks. It
also says about government officials, business and labor leaders, and
environmentalists attended the session to talk about the smart grid and the
features it will provide.
The CRAAP evaluation shows that for currency the information was published
April 2009, the information has not been revised and the topic will require current
information seeing how this was writing back in 2009 and it is now 2013, also
the links are functional. For relevance,
the information does relate to my topic and the intended audience is for
people interested in the smart grid and about how it will help with cost, the
information is at an appropriate level and I have looked at a variety of sources
(2 sources) before determining this is the one I was going to use and also I would
be comfortable citing this source in my research paper because it does have
information that I am looking for that is similar to my U.S. Energy Grid source.
For authority, the author is Kramer,
David and the author is qualified to write on the topic, there is no contact
information and the URL reveals an .edu. For accuracy, the information comes from Physics Today and the
information is supported by evidence, the information has not been reviewed or
refereed and I can verify any of the information from personal knowledge and
the language or tone seems unbiased and there is not spelling, grammar or
typographical errors. For purpose, the
purpose of the information is to inform and yes, the author make his intention
clear and the information is opinion and some fact, also there are political
biases.
The passage that was interested to me was about the
standards are needed section. This passage surprised me with how a member of
the committee. On energy and natural resources said about lack of standards as
the biggest impediment to modernization because I thought the new smart grid
was suppose to have high standards with all the energy saving it will do. Further
questions this information raise that might be worth investigating is from what
Evan Gaddis said about the slow progress on standards, if the standards are
slow progressing, then what will that mean for cost and making it eco friendly.
This question is important to me because in this economy not a lot of people
have enough money to pay for high standard smart grid since they are taking
their time with progress.
Why we need a smarter grid
This article is about how Spain renewable energy in
which more than half of Spain was powered by wind and how there was a problem
with how it was not connected to the rest of Europe. Which caused for
technicians to shut off windmills to avoid overloading the electricity grid and
how electricity-wind can be unpredictable and send excess electricity into a calibrated
power grid? With the energy supplies far away, it’s hard to power the entire
nation and without money in new high voltage power lines then the windmills
will be useless. The electrical grids are really old and with rickety networks
that cover a few states, which further complicates national borders.
The CRAAP evaluation shows that for currency the information was published
8 November, 2009 and the information has not been revised or updated, the topic
requires current information since it was from 2009 and the links are
functional. For relevance, the
information relates to my topic and the intended audience is people who are
interested with power grids and renewable energy, the information is at an
appropriate level and I have looked at a variety of sources before determining
this one I was going to use and I would not be comfortable citing this source in
my research paper because it does not have a author. For authority, the source is National Geographic and the source is
qualified to write on the topic and there is not contact information, the URL
reveals it is an .edu. For accuracy, the
information comes from New Scientist and the information is supported by
evidence and the information has not been reviewed, I can verify any of the
information from personal knowledge and the language or tone is free of emotion
and there is no spelling, grammar or typographical errors. For purpose, the purpose of the information
is to inform and the sponsor make their purpose clear and the information is
fact and some opinion, there are ideological and cultural biases.
This passage interests me because it talks about a
new way for renewable energy which is wind energy. The passage surprised me with
the wind energy idea because it would be better to use instead of power lines
and big transformers. As long as the wind keeps coming but they would need to
make a lot of windmills in order to power a whole nation with wind. The passage
taught me that I did not already know was about thinking about windmills and
using them to our advantage on windy days to make less stress. On the
transformers and electric power lines and this information is helpful in
answering my research questions by taking a second look at how more eco
friendly we can make the smart grid with wind power.
Friday, March 29, 2013
Responding to sources
Martin, Mike. (2010, July/August). The Great Green
Grid. 21, 23-29.
“The Great Green Grid” article says about how the
grid we have now just moves electricity in one direction and the smart grid. If
installed, would allow electronics to communicate with each other and help
manage customers’ energy costs and usage. This article also speaks about who is
going to pay for the smart grid and how politics are likely to slow efforts for
finding consumers to pay for the new grid ahead of time. The smart grid
requires monitoring technology in every home to see how families are using more
then what they need for electricity. Pilot programs are happening from small to
big picture already and say how different states are already installing smart
grids or even trying to do better than the smart grid and make up their own way
of renewable energy electricity.
The passage that interests me is about privacy
concerns that go with the smart grid and if the smart grid is installed. Then
there will be monitoring of homes and families will not have much privacy and
this passage surprises me because I did not know the smart grid needed to have
monitoring technology in homes in order to make a difference with cost and
security. My question about the information that might be worth investigating
is how a pilot project have anything to do with the smart grid. This question
is important to me because it would help me make more sense about the smart
grid and help me understand what pilot projects means.
Greenfield,
Dave. (2009, November 9). Is the smart grid a dumb idea. 26, S10-S11, S14-S16,
S18-S20
This source agrees with what my first source says
about the smart grid and how it will help improve homes and companies. I see
this source agreeing with my first source from how my second source says about
blackouts occurring more and more every year. Also my second source agrees with
how the smart grid could improve security, reliability, and have a green
footprint to help the world also. The second source speaks about how the smart
grid is going to get funded and agrees with that other states are already
developing the smart grid.
Friday, March 22, 2013
Evaluating Sources
http://web.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.hacc.edu/ehost/detail?vid=3&sid=eca3627d-ba4f-47ce-8479-c8bf196bf7cf%40sessionmgr11&hid=1&bdata=JnNpdGU9ZWhvc3QtbGl2ZQ%3d%3d#db=f5h&AN=83413877
The article found from the library’s website is called, “Storm surge switches the grid to “off” and for currency the date of the article is January 12, 2012 that was when the information was published. The information has not be revised or updated and the older sources work as well and yes, the links are functional. The next part for relevance is that the information does relate to my topic but does not answer my question and the intended audience is for anyone who is interested in this topic. The information is not too elementary but needs to be advanced some more to know more about the information and yes, I did look at a variety of sources (3 articles) before determining this one I was going to use that was closest to my topic. I would be more comfortable citing this source in my research paper if it was closer to the date of when my topic about “U.S. Energy Grid” went on.
There is no contact information and the URL does not reveal anything about the author or source. As for accuracy, the topic does not say where the information comes from and the information is not supported by evidence. The information has been reviewed and I can verify the information from personal knowledge, the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion and there is no spelling, grammar or typographical errors. For purpose, the information’s purpose was to inform about the wind-production tax credit and the kilowatt-hours and the author does make his intention and purpose clear. The information is fact, the point of view appears objective and there are political and ideological biases.
The article found from the library’s website is called, “Storm surge switches the grid to “off” and for currency the date of the article is January 12, 2012 that was when the information was published. The information has not be revised or updated and the older sources work as well and yes, the links are functional. The next part for relevance is that the information does relate to my topic but does not answer my question and the intended audience is for anyone who is interested in this topic. The information is not too elementary but needs to be advanced some more to know more about the information and yes, I did look at a variety of sources (3 articles) before determining this one I was going to use that was closest to my topic. I would be more comfortable citing this source in my research paper if it was closer to the date of when my topic about “U.S. Energy Grid” went on.
Authority is
that the article is by Russell, Pam Radtke and the source is ENR: Engineering
News-Record and I am not sure about the author’s credentials or organizational
affiliations but the author is qualified to write on the topic. There is no
contact information and the URL does not reveal anything about the author or
source. For accuracy, the information comes from ENR: Engineering News-Record
and the information are supported by evidence. The information has not been
reviewed or refereed and yes, I can verify any of the information in the other
source. The language or tone does seem unbiased but does have emotion like sadness
and anger of what happened and there is no spelling, grammar or typographical
errors in this information. For purpose the purpose of the information is to
inform about what the storm called, “Sandy” caused to the energy grid and the
author makes his intentions clear. The information is both fact and opinion and
the point of view appears objective, there are political and cultural biases.
http://articles.washingtonpost.com/2012-10-11/opinions/35499513_1_wind-tax-credit-wind-turbines-megawatts-of-wind-generation
The article found form Google is called, “Why the
U.S. needs a networked energy grid” and for currency the date the information
was published is October 11, 2012. The information has not been revised or updated
and the older sources work for this topic and there are no links for this
topic. For relevance the information does relate to my topic and the intended
audience is for people who know about the networked energy grid, the
information is advanced for my needs and I have looked at 2 sources before
determining this is the one I was going to use. I would not be comfortable
citing this source in my research paper because it would need to be less
advanced for my paper. For authority, the topic is by C. Boyden Gray and I am
not sure about the author’s credentials or organizational affiliations, the
author is qualified to write on this topic. There is no contact information and the URL does not reveal anything about the author or source. As for accuracy, the topic does not say where the information comes from and the information is not supported by evidence. The information has been reviewed and I can verify the information from personal knowledge, the language or tone seem unbiased and free of emotion and there is no spelling, grammar or typographical errors. For purpose, the information’s purpose was to inform about the wind-production tax credit and the kilowatt-hours and the author does make his intention and purpose clear. The information is fact, the point of view appears objective and there are political and ideological biases.
The credibility of these two sources is different
from each other based on my analysis the first source is credible because it is
more related to my topic then the second source. The first source is about how
the huge storm, Sandy which destroyed a great part of the energy grid and
brought light to changing the way the energy grid. Is for the future if another
disaster happens and my topic is about how the transformers malfunctioned and a
blackout happened everywhere because of the grid system being old so they are
planning on making a smart gird to be able to be strong. The second source is
about pricing that is being used for something other than for fixing the grid
and wanting more “feel-good” energy policy like wind turbines. Which is close
but not what I am looking for credible for my topic since my does say about a
smart grid, it does not say a lot about money wise and I am more interested
about how they plan on putting the new grid in, I am not looking for how much
money it will take to make this smart grid happen.
Friday, March 8, 2013
Sources On the Energy Grid
For my first source, it talks about how the US
energy grid is going to try to be better on the environmental footprint and
avoid liquefied natural gas and how long it might take to change the old with
the new. The reason why it is taking so long to happen is because investors
would much rather build plants that makes the cost go up for our nation and is
hard on the environmental footprint. For having a better footprint on Earth, we
would need to have the investors invest in projects like building large wind
farms for clean energy and have clean coal and nuclear plants to help the land.
Trying to get these resources is a problem since they are often remotely
located and will need to bring to urban markets but expectations are growing for
this new energy grid.
My second source talks about this smart grid might
not be real and the difference between transmission and distribution. Even though
the U.S. Department of Energy attended a meeting about the grid all they came
up with was a term to call it which is called, “smart grid”. Since the smart
grid is not getting built anytime soon, this means higher electric prices and
more risk in result of a grid failure. It is not clear if the technical view is
going to make it reality or is it going to be a political view where money will
build the smart grid.
I chose these two sources because they talk about
the US energy grid and how it is going to affect the world and the future of
electricity. I find interesting about the first source is that it talked about
the environmental footprint the grid will have on Earth because I feel like the
footprint is a big thing. For keeping this world to keep going and if we do not
do anything now we will all pay for it sooner or later. The second source I found
interesting because it talked about how the smart grid might not be real since
people cannot decide if it is going to make a change in the world or not and
they rather just stick to how things are going now.
My grasp on the topic so far is that this grid is
going to change the world if it happens and when it does it will help the Earth
and help the people. I understand the issue pretty good since I am studying to
be an electrician and will need to know about the power grids and how they work
so if they do fail I can fix them. A additional question I have about my topic
is that how are they going to make this smart grid, like where are they going
to put it and what materials is it going to be made out of. I hope to learn
next about my topic is how it will work on being better than the old energy
grid.
Citing
Krapels, Edward; Conant, Stephen. (2008, November). US grid: it’s our way or the highway. 16. 74, 76-77.
Kennedy, Maize. (2007, June). Features. .Transmission: Smart grid still just a vision thing. 151. 68
Krapels, Edward; Conant, Stephen. (2008, November). US grid: it’s our way or the highway. 16. 74, 76-77.
Kennedy, Maize. (2007, June). Features. .Transmission: Smart grid still just a vision thing. 151. 68
Wednesday, February 20, 2013
Topic from Database
My topic is US Energy Grid and I learned of this problem when I was 12 after I woke up to no electricity and went out to ask my dad what had happened and that's when I found out about the blackout at New York which affected some of Pennsylvania as well and wandered how a wide-scale blackout can occur. I am interested in the US Energy Grid topic because if I am going to be a electrician, I will have to deal with major blackouts that occur and deal with fixing the problem if it is from power lines or transformers which is part of my field. Researching this topic can help me on the job by learning of a new grid system called, "smart grid" which can cause increased efficiency, low costs, and promote Eco-friendly energy, which in turn can help prevent blackouts and make more jobs for electricians so we can change out the old with the new in a faster time to make more people happy and would cost less than when blackouts would occur less. I already knew about the topic is that the blackout affected New York with being out of electricity for over 24 hours or more than 3 days in the hot summer and they had a lot of traffic accidents because of the lights being out also. I hope to learn more about how much electricity affected people when the blackout occurred and how the smart gird can help. The audience that could be interested in this blog would be electricians and someone who was curious about the wide-scale blackout.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)